FRCS (Tr & Orth) Oral Examination: Abbreviated Both Bones Forearm Fracture Case Presentation

 

A 32-year-old woman is admitted after a fall from her bicycle. She has an isolated injury to her left upper limb. These are her radiographs.

 

 

Quiz on Forearm Fractures
1. What do the radiographs show?
The radiographs show displaced midshaft diaphyseal fractures of both bones of the left forearm.
These radiographs show displaced midshaft diaphyseal fractures of both bones of the left forearm.
2. How would you treat this injury?
I would make a careful patient assessment, completing the history and examination. Particularly, I would look for any open wounds, make an assessment of the soft tissues and the neurovascular status of the limb as well as any suggestion of compartment syndrome. I would ensure that the patient has adequate analgesia and would splint the forearm in an above elbow backslab in 90 degrees of flexion. In an otherwise healthy adult, I would plan to treat this injury definitively on the next routine trauma operating list with dynamic compression plating of both fractures using 3.5 mm LC-DC plates.
A displaced midshaft diaphyseal fracture of both bones of the left forearm would require a careful patient assessment, including a thorough examination of the wound, soft tissues, and neurovascular status. Adequate analgesia should be given, and the forearm should be splinted in an above elbow backslab in 90 degrees of flexion. Definitive treatment would involve dynamic compression plating of both fractures using 3.5 mm LC-DC plates on the next routine trauma operating list in an otherwise healthy adult.
3. Ten months after surgery, you are following up this patient in clinic and these are her radiographs. What do they show and what treatment would you advise?
These radiographs show that the fracture has been treated operatively with plate fixation. The alignment appears satisfactory; however, there is a persisting delayed or non-union of the ulnar fracture. The radius seems to have united. I would complete my assessment of the patient, looking for any persisting symptoms suggestive of delayed union or non-union or infection such as pain, local swelling or erythema. I would take some blood for full blood count and inflammatory markers. I would arrange a CT scan of the forearm to confirm the degree of union of both fractures and if non-union is confirmed in the absence of infection, I would advise revision fixation of the non-union with autologous iliac crest bone grafting. I would consider the use of a bone stimulator for 6–8 weeks as an interim measure, and current guidance suggests that this is appropriate for an established non-union after 9 months. If the screening investigations are suggestive of infection, then I would send peripheral blood and wound samples for culture. I would also perform an initial debridement at which I would sample tissue taken from the non-union site so that targeted antibiotic treatment can be given before definitive grafting is undertaken.
These radiographs show that the left forearm fracture has been treated operatively with plate fixation. Although the radius has healed satisfactorily, the ulnar fracture shows a persisting delayed or non-union. To confirm the degree of union of both fractures, a CT scan of the forearm should be arranged. If non-union is confirmed and infection is not present, revision fixation of the non-union with autologous iliac crest bone grafting is recommended. A bone stimulator may be used as an interim measure for an established non-union after 9 months. If the screening investigations suggest infection, wound samples and peripheral blood should be cultured. Before definitive grafting is undertaken, tissue taken from the non-union site would be sampled during the initial debridement for targeted antibiotic treatment.

Quiz Results

You scored out of 3.

Review the questions you missed and try again!

  • FRCS (Tr & Orth)
  • Oral Examination
  • Both Bones Forearm Fracture
  • Case Presentation