Operative Treatment of Radius and Ulna Diaphyseal Nonunions

Operative Treatment of Radius and Ulna Diaphyseal Nonunions

DEFINITION

■    A diaphyseal forearm fracture is generally considered to be a nonunion if healing has not taken place within 6 months.
■    Nonunions  are generally classified as  hypertrophic or  atrophic, an important distinction in treatment selection.
■    Hypertrophic nonunions have abundant callus and a rich blood supply and result from inadequate stability of fracture fixation.  This type of nonunion is rare in the forearm and constitutes less than 10% of nonunion cases.9
■    Atrophic nonunions are characterized by poor blood supply and little or no callus formation.
■    Nonunion of the forearm diaphysis is rare because of the success of current techniques of plate and screw fixation. Nonunion rates of only 2% in the radius and 4% in the ulna are reported.2

ANATOMY

■    The forearm consists of the radius and ulna, joined at either end by the proximal  and distal radioulnar joints (PRUJ  and DRUJ, respectively) (FIG  1).
■    The ulna is straight, while the radius has both an apex ra-
■    Both the curvature of the radius and the integrity of the interosseous space and interosseous membrane (IOM)  must be maintained for the forearm “joint” to function optimally.
■    The  diaphyseal portions  of  the  radius  and  ulna  are  surrounded by complex anatomy,  including neural and vascular structures, that  must be considered during  any  surgical approach.  Both  radius and  ulna  are covered by  muscle proximally, while the ulna emerges distally to be subcutaneous.

PATHOGENESIS

■    Nonunions  of the diaphysis of the forearm are rare and result most commonly from incorrect or inadequate treatment.
■    Inadequate  fixation,   generally less than  six  cortices of screw fixation  proximal  and distal to the fracture, will increase the rate of nonunion.
■    Lack of attention to critical surgical principles such as creating compression across the fracture site (either with the use of  an interfragmentary screw or a  compression plate) also leads to nonunion.
■    Nonoperative treatment results in markedly increased rates
 
dial and apex dorsal curvature.
of nonunion and other complications.
With the exception of
■    It can help to think of the forearm as a joint rather than a pair of long bones.
■    Pronation and supination are achieved by rotation of the curved radius about the straight ulna.
Pronation and
isolated, minimally displaced ulnar shaft fractures, all adult
diaphyseal forearm fractures require operative management.
■    Comminution  increases the risk of nonunion, with 12% of comminuted, diaphyseal fractures going on to develop nonunion after treatment with dynamic compression plates.11
■    Fracture characteristics that increase the risk of  nonunion include  extensive devascularization and  periosteal stripping,
 
bone loss, and infection.
■    Open,   comminuted  fractures  with  bone  loss  have  the highest rate of nonunion.7
■    Patient comorbidities known to increase rates of nonunion include diabetes mellitus, steroid use, malnutrition, and renal dysfunction.

NATURAL HISTORY

■    Once a nonunion of the forearm is established, it will not go on to heal spontaneously.
■    If significant shortening of either the radius or ulna occurs, the intricate anatomy of the entire forearm “joint” can be disrupted. Malalignment  of the DRUJ secondary to such shortening can cause pain and lead to loss of motion at the wrist.
■    Loss  of  motion  secondary to  pain,  particularly pronation and  supination,  can  lead  to  shortening and  fibrosis  of  the IOM. This can lead to permanent loss of rotational motion in the forearm.

PATIENT HISTORY AND PHYSICAL FINDINGS

■    Patients with nonunion of the diaphysis of the radius or ulnaThe two bones of the forearm form a functional unit, with the axis of rotation extending from the radiocapitellar joint to the distal radioulnar joint.

FIG 1 • The two bones of the forearm form a functional unit, with the axis of rotation extending from the radiocapitellar joint to the distal radioulnar joint.

 
most commonly present with pain.
■    This pain frequently worsens with attempts to use the extremity for lifting or pushing, but may also occur at rest.
 
■    Resisted  rotational  movements  are  frequently  painful, such as turning a key in a lock.
■    It  is important  to  explore whether infection  could  be the cause of the nonunion. Important history includes whether or not the original fracture was open, whether postoperative complications or drainage developed, and whether the patient has received antibiotics.
■    During  the physical examination,  the examiner should do the following:
■    Palpate the nonunion site for pain.
■    Grasp  the bone on  either side of  the nonunion  and attempt to flex and extend the nonunion to assess fracture stability and healing. Palpable motion and increased pain indicate lack of union.
■    Loss of  flexion–extension in the elbow may result from pain.  Loss of pronation and supination indicates deranged forearm anatomy or pain.
■    Loss of flexion or extension at the wrist may indicate pain or scarring of muscle and tendons or IOM around the nonunion. Loss of radioulnar deviation may indicate DRUJ abnormality secondary to shortening at the nonunion site.

IMAGING AND OTHER DIAGNOSTIC STUDIES

■    Plain radiographs are essential for diagnosis. This should include AP and lateral views of the forearm, elbow, and wrist.
■    Comparative  views of  the contralateral forearm,  elbow, and wrist are also essential for preoperative planning.
■    Plain radiographs will allow  the surgeon to determine if the nonunion is hypertrophic (FIG  2A)  or atrophic (FIG  2B).
■    CT  is helpful in identifying synostosis, assessing rotational
deformity,  and evaluating the size of  the gap  between bone ends at the nonunion  site. CT  also allows assessment of  the DRUJ and PRUJ.
■    The metal suppression CT  technique minimizes the bright scatter created by retained hardware.

FIG 2 • A.  Radiograph showing an  infected, hypertrophic nonunion. The abundant callus  formation indicates a biologically active nonunion. B. Radiograph showing an atrophic nonunion. There is complete absence of callus  at the fracture site.  The problem in an  atrophic nonunion is lack of biologic activity. (Courtesy of Thomas R. Hunt III, MD.)

FIG 2 • A.  Radiograph showing an  infected, hypertrophic nonunion. The abundant callus  formation indicates a biologically active nonunion. B. Radiograph showing an atrophic nonunion. There is complete absence of callus  at the fracture site.  The problem in an  atrophic nonunion is lack of biologic activity. (Courtesy of Thomas R. Hunt III, MD.)

■    MRI  is  rarely  used  but  can  allow  further  evaluation  of the IOM.
■    A   technetium-99m  bone   scan  followed   by   an   indium-
111–labeled leukocyte scan may be indicated when suspicion of an infected nonunion exists.
■    False-positive and false-negative results occur.

DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS

■    Malunion
■    Infection
■    IOM injury
■    Painful hardware

NONOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT

■    The goal of treatment is to alleviate pain and restore function to the forearm. This can rarely be accomplished without surgical intervention.
■    In rare circumstances (if the patient is a high risk for surgery due to comorbidities, for example), an external bone stimulator can be used.
■    A  minority of  patients develop a stable, fibrous nonunion that is painless and allows good function. Nonoperative management can be considered in such patients.

SURGICAL MANAGEMENT

■    In all nonunions of the forearm, the first considerations are the patient’s level of pain and function.
■    The  surgeon should not elect to operate based on radiographic findings alone.
■    All  patients with nonunions should undergo a workup  to determine if the cause of the nonunion is infection, particularly after open fractures.
■    The workup should include careful history of open fracture, drainage, or postoperative complications after initial surgery.
■    Blood  should  be obtained for  a  complete blood  count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and C-reactive protein.
■    Nuclear  medicine imaging  should  be  performed  if  the suspicion of infection is high.

Preoperative Planning

■    All  imaging studies should be reviewed and pathoanatomy recognized.
■    Plain  radiographs should  be reviewed for  presence or absence of callus in order to categorize the nonunion as hypertrophic or atrophic.
■    If  a  nonunion  of  the forearm is hypertrophic (which is rare), it may be treated by simple revision of hardware, creating compression across the fracture site with either a compression screw or a compression plate. This is the same technique that  should  be  used for  initial  management of radius or ulna fractures (see Chap.  HA-4).
■    If  any  possibility of  infection  at  the nonunion  site exists, plans must be made to search for infection when the nonunion site is opened, and to have an alternative treatment plan if infection is encountered.
■    Preoperative antibiotics may be held until cultures are obtained from the nonunion site (ensure the tourniquet is not  inflated  if  antibiotics  are  administered later  in  the case).
■    Intraoperative culture swabs and tissue for aerobic, anaerobic, and fungal cultures should be obtained from sites within the nonunion.
■    Patients should be made aware that if severe infection is encountered, the planned procedure may need to be altered. For example, if frank purulence is encountered, the nonunion repair may be abandoned in favor of débridement and irrigation with possible antibiotic bead placement and even external fixation if stability is compromised.
■    Template the radiographs to ensure selection of proper plate size and length.
■    DCP, LCDCP,  and  combination  locking  plates  are  all appropriate.
■    A  minimum of  six  cortices of  screw purchase proximal and  distal  to  the  nonunion  is  critical.  This  may  require plates longer than those available in a standard plating set.
■    In osteoporotic bone, the use of locking plates should be considered.
■    If bone graft will be required, the type of graft should be determined preoperatively. While autograft is still considered the gold standard, a vast array of bone graft substitutes are now available. The surgeon’s preference and familiarity with various bone graft substitutes may guide this choice. It is important to determine if a structural graft will be required, as this may necessitate the use of autograft.
■    Patients should be counseled regarding the possible need for (and risks associated with) various types of autograft,  including the possible need for a tricortical iliac crest or fibula graft if significant bone loss is encountered.
■    A  vascularized fibula  graft may be used to fill  large defects, especially those associated with infection.1,4,6,12
■    A  complete examination  of  range of  motion  of  the elbow and wrist, including pronation and supination, should be performed under anesthesia.
Positioning
■    The patient should be positioned supine with the operative arm extended on a radiolucent arm table.
■    A nonsterile or sterile tourniquet may be applied, but full access to the elbow is necessary.
■   Because  restoration of the radial bow is a critical component in restoring forearm motion, intraoperative radiographs showing the entire radius are essential. For this reason, use of the mini C-arm should be avoided in favor of regular fluoroscopy, with its much larger field of view.
■    The selected site for harvest of autograft should also be prepared and draped.
Approach
■    The approach to either the radius or ulna should generally be through the original surgical incisions.
■    Approach to the radius is most commonly volar through the standard Henry approach.  Proximal  nonunions of the radius may be more easily accessed via a dorsal Thompson approach, particularly in muscular individuals.
■    Care should be taken to identify and protect the posterior interosseous nerve during this approach.
■    The ulna is accessed along the subcutaneous border in the interval between the flexor carpi ulnaris and the extensor carpi ulnaris.
■    Care  should be taken to identify and protect the dorsal cutaneous branch of the ulnar nerve distally.
■    In all cases, preservation of blood supply is key to healing of a nonunion. Therefore, periosteal stripping should be kept to a minimum and the use of cautery should be restricted to vessel coagulation.

PLATE FIXATION FOR TREATMENT OF  FOREARM NONUNIONS

Preparation of the Nonunion
■            Determine the correct length of  the radius or  ulna by measuring the corresponding contralateral bone.
■            Expose   the nonunion site   and search for   evidence of
infection. If found, send specimens for  Gram  stain and culture and abort the planned procedure. Perform a two-stage reconstruction.
■       Thoroughly débride  all  necrotic and infected bone
and soft  tissue. Remove all hardware.
■       Place  antibiotic-loaded PMMA beads in the gap.
■       Begin  a  multiweek course of  antibiotics before proceeding with definitive nonunion repair.
■            If infection is considered unlikely, after  removal of  all
hardware, thoroughly débride the nonunion site  of  all necrotic and inflammatory tissue, synovial membranes, and sclerotic or avascular bone (TECH FIG 1A).
■       Tools  such  as  curved curettes, small  rongeurs, and a
small  high-speed burr (with copious irrigation to prevent thermal injury  to the bone) are  helpful.
■       Flatten the bone ends to allow for  excellent frag-
ment-to-fragment contact with compression.
■            Open the sclerotic bone ends using sequentially larger diameter drills.
■       Pass these drills proximally and distally as far  as possi-
ble  to open the medullary canals (TECH FIG 1B).
■            Restrict elevation of muscle and periosteum to only what is needed to thoroughly débride the nonunion and to realign the bone.
■            Realign the bone and restore length by  manipulating
fragments with bone-holding forceps.
■      Use  of   a  small   skeletal  distractor,  small   external fixator,  or  lamina spreader  aids   in  restoration  of length.10
■            Measure the length of  the residual bone defect directly
and, taking into consideration the preoperative plan, determine the appropriate bone graft to use.
Compression Plating Without
Bone Graft
■            In  rare  cases   with  minimal  or   no   bone  loss   at  the nonunion site,  the bone may  be  plated in  situ  without causing shortening. Because the bone remains at normalTECH  FIG   1   •   A.    Complete  débridement   of   the nonunion site  is the essential first  step. Any fibrous or necrotic material must be  removed and the bone ends delivered. B.   Medullary canals are   opened  using in creasing-diameter drill bits  to allow vascular ingrowth

TECH  FIG   1   •   A.    Complete  débridement   of   the nonunion site  is the essential first  step. Any fibrous or necrotic material must be  removed and the bone ends delivered. B.   Medullary canals are   opened  using in creasing-diameter drill bits  to allow vascular ingrowth.

                                                                                                                                             
length, the relationship of  the radius and ulna at both the DRUJ and the PRUJ is not disrupted and rotation will be  preserved.
■       This technique may  also  be  used if there is nonunion
of both the radius and the ulna. Both  bones may then be  shortened a symmetrical distance.
■            After bone preparation as detailed above, anatomically
align the bone ends and precisely apply a  compression plate using the same technique employed for acute forearm  fractures.
■       Ensure that compression of the bone ends is achieved.
■            If a  small  bone gap exists  after compression, the other forearm bone may   then be   shortened to restore the length relationship.
■       Because this  approach  involves surgery on  a  normal
bone, this  strategy should be  used with caution.
Cancellous Bone Grafting
■            Cancellous bone grafting is generally used for  small  defects  up  to 3 cm that can  be  effectively stabilized with a plate.
■       Gaps  of  up  to 6  cm  have been  successfully treated
using cancellous bone for  grafting.9
■            Firmly  pack   the cancellous autograft  into the residual nonunion defect after the plate is applied.
■            Ensure the graft does not escape from the nonunion site
and come to lie on  the IOM (TECH FIG 2).
Structural Corticocancellous
Autograft Bone Grafting
■            Structural autograft harvested from the anterior or posterior iliac crest  is used for  larger defects.
■            Expose  the superior crest  and define the inner and outer
tables.
■            Utilize  a  water-cooled sagittal saw  and osteotomes to harvest a  tricortical block  of  bone from the iliac  crest. Additionally, harvest cancellous bone to fill defects that may  present.
■       The graft should be  slightly larger than that required based on  preoperative planning.
■            Precisely  contour the graft to fit  snugly into the defect.
Square the ends of  the graft to match the ends of  the bone fragments.5
■       Alternatively, cut both the bone ends of the radius or
ulna and of the bone block  chamfered, or on the bias, to increase the area of bony contact.3 This also allows the graft to be  wedged securely in place.
■            Insert the graft before plate fixation and fill any residual
gaps with cancellous bone after plate application.
Bone graftTECH FIG 2  • The  nonunion gap is distracted if necessary to recreate the normal anatomic bone length. A 3.5-mm plate with a minimum of three screws  proximal and distal should be used. Cancellous bone graft  is  inserted and packed in  the nonunion gap.

TECH FIG 2  • The  nonunion gap is distracted if necessary to recreate the normal anatomic bone length. A 3.5-mm plate with a minimum of three screws  proximal and distal should be used. Cancellous bone graft  is  inserted and packed in  the nonunion gap.

Nonvascularized Structural Fibula Autograft With Cortical Allograft Bone Grafting
■            An appropriate-length segmental graft is harvested from the fibula and placed into the defect.
■            The  fibula is approached laterally, via the intramuscular
plane between  the peroneal muscles and the soleus.
■            A cuff  of muscle 2 to 3 mm  in thickness should be  left  to protect the periosteum.
■            The  IOM is incised longitudinally, taking care  to avoid
the posterior neurovascular bundle.
■            The fibula is osteotomized proximally and distally to create an  appropriate-length graft.
■       Complications of  fibular harvest are  rare but include
transient motor weakness, peroneal nerve palsy,  and flexor hallucis longus (FHL) contracture.
■       A  minimum of  6  cm  of  the  distal fibula must be
retained  to  avoid  adversely affecting  the  distal tibiofibular syndesmosis and ankle joint function.
■            Insert the fibula graft into the defect and then apply the
plate as described below, first placing the two screws  just proximal and just  distal to the nonunion to gain initial compression.
■            Select  a cortical allograft several centimeters longer than
the defect.
■       Tibial  allograft is recommended due to its  suitable thickness and mechanical characteristics, which provide  excellent screw  purchase.8
■            Place  the cortical allograft along the outer cortex of the
bone, opposite the plate, spanning beyond the length of the fibula allograft.
■            Insert the  remainder of  the screws   so  that  they pass
through  the  plate  and  then  the  patient’s bone and finally   into the cortical allograft on  the  opposite side (TECH FIG 3).
 

TECH FIG  3  •  Combined intercalary autograft  and allograft strut technique  described by  Moroni et  al.8  After débridement  of  the nonunion site, an intercalary graft of appropriate length is harvested from the patient’s fibula and placed in the gap. A cortical allograft is placed opposite to the plate, and screws  are  placed passing though

 

COMPRESSION PLATE FIXATION

■            Select  a  3.5-mm (small  fragment) compression plate of adequate length to ensure a minimum of  three or  four screws   (six  to  eight  cortices) on   either  side   of   the nonunion.
■       Always  err  on  the side  of a longer plate.
■       Thinner locking plates may be considered when structural fibular autografts are  combined with cortical allograft struts.
■            Fix the plate to the bone in  compression (ensuring that
proper length is maintained) with one screw  proximal and one screw  distal to the nonunion, then use full-length fluoroscopic views  or  radiographs of  the forearm to ensure restoration of length, bow, and joint alignment.
■       Compare with the contralateral forearm.
■            Insert the remaining screws.
■       Ideally, screws  are  not placed into the graft itself  and the graft is stabilized by the compression created by the plate (TECH FIG 4).
■            Close the wound routinely and apply an  above-elbow or
sugartong splint.

H FIG 4 • Modified Nicoll technique with tricortical iliac crest graft.  The   graft  is   chamfered, allowing the  graft  to  be compressed as the plate is applied.

TECH FIG 4 • Modified Nicoll technique with tricortical iliac crest graft.  The   graft  is   chamfered, allowing the  graft  to  be compressed as the plate is applied.

 

PEARLS AND PITFALLS

Indications                               ■  Careful evaluation of the patient’s pain and functional limitations must be  done before surgical management is planned.
Radiographs                           ■  Differentiation should be  made between hypertrophic and atrophic nonunions, as treatment differs.
■  Contralateral radiographs must be  used to determine the appropriate length of the forearm bones and degree of radial bow.
■  Anatomic restoration of length and bow is necessary to allow full rotational motion of the forearm.
Diagnosis of infection            ■  A complete preoperative infection workup should be  done for  all patients with a nonunion.
■  A negative preoperative workup does not rule  out infection.
■  An intraoperative infection workup, including Gram  stain and culture, should be  performed and an alternative plan should be  available if infection is encountered.
Nonunion site  preparation    ■  Débridement of all necrotic, sclerotic, and avascular tissue from the nonunion site  is essential.
■  Opening the sclerotic bone ends and gentle reaming of the medullary canals promotes ingrowth of medullary blood vessels.
■  Periosteal stripping and cautery must be  minimized to preserve periosteal blood supply.
Graft selection                        ■  Defects up  to 3 cm are  successfully managed with cancellous autograft  and appropriate fixation.
■ Bone  graft substitutes may  offer alternatives to autograft, but no  comparative studies exist at this  time.
Compression of structural      ■  Compression must be  created across  all structural grafts. grafts

POSTOPERATIVE CARE

■    The longer motion is delayed after surgery, the greater the chance the patient will develop stiffness. Therefore, early active range of motion (ROM) should be initiated at the first postoperative visit, except in cases with more tenuous fixation.
■    Use of the arm for activities of daily living is encouraged.
■    If the patient has difficulty in achieving satisfactory ROM with  active,  active-assisted, and  gentle passive ROM, static progressive splints may be used.
■    Having  the patient sleep in a static extension splint may significantly improve elbow extension.
■    Heavy  lifting,   pushing,  and  weight  bearing  are  delayed until  radiographic  evidence of  healing is present, often 3 to
6 months after the index procedure.

OUTCOMES

■    When precise surgical techniques are used, such as creating stable compression across structural grafts, high rates of union are expected.
■    Rates of healing from 95% to 100% are reported for all of the methods described in this chapter.3,8,9
■    Failure of  union is related to recurrence of  previous infection in nearly all cases. The prognosis for infected nonunions should be guarded.
■    Patient satisfaction  does not  correlate directly with  bony healing.   In   multiple  studies  only   two   thirds  of   patients achieved good or excellent results.3,5,8,9
■    Unsatisfactory results are associated with poor postoperative motion in the majority of cases.
■    Other  injuries to  the  upper extremity (common  in  highenergy trauma associated with nonunions) contributed to unsatisfactory overall function in a minority of patients.9,10
■    Because nonunion of the forearm diaphysis is a rare condition,  no comparative studies of  treatment methods exist,  including the use of bone graft substitutes.

COMPLICATIONS

■    Infection
■    Graft  displacement
■    Recurrent nonunion and hardware failure
■    Loss of motion
■    Synostosis
■    Pain or other complications at the autograft harvest site
REFERENCES
1.  Adani R, Delcroix L, Innocenti M,  et al. Reconstruction of large posttraumatic skeletal defects of the forearm by vascularized free fibular graft. Microsurgery 2004;24:423–429.
2.  Chapman  MW, Gordon  JE,  Zissimos  AG. Compression-plate fixation of acute fractures of the diaphyses of the radius and ulna. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1989;71A:159–169.
3. Davey PA, Simonis RB.  Modification of the Nicoll  bone-grafting technique for nonunion of the radius and/or ulna. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002;84B:30–33.
4.  Dell PC,  Sheppard JE. Vascularized bone grafts in the treatment of infected forearm nonunion. J Hand  Surg Am 1984;9A:653–658.
5.  Grace TG, Eversman WW.  The management of segmental bone loss associated with forearm fractures. J Bone Joint  Surg Am  1980;62A:
1150–1155.
6. Jupiter JB,  Gerhard  HJ, Guerrero J, et al.  Treatment of  segmental defects of  the radius with  use of  the vascularized osteoseptocutaneous fibular  autogenous graft.  J Bone Joint  Surg Am  1997;79A:
542–550.
7.  Moed  BR,  Kellam JF,  Foster JR,  et al. Immediate internal fixation of open fractures of the diaphysis of the forearm. J Bone Joint Surg Am
1986;68A:1008–1017.
8.  Moroni  AG, Rollo G, Guzzardella M,  et al. Surgical treatment of isolated forearm non-union with segmental bone loss. Injury 1997;28:
497–504.
9. Ring  D,  Allende C, Jafarnia  K,  et al.  Ununited diaphyseal forearm fractures with segmental defects: plate fixation  and autogenous cancellous   bone-grafting.   J  Bone   Joint   Surg   Am   2004;86A:
2440–2445.
10.  Ring  D,  Jupiter JB,  Gulotta  L.  Atrophic  nonunions of the proximal ulna. Clin  Orthop  Relat Res 2003;409:268–274.
11.  Ring  D,  Rhim  R,  Carpenter C, et al.  Comminuted  diaphyseal fractures of the radius and ulna: does bone grafting affect nonunion rate? J Trauma 2005;59:436–440.
12.  Safoury  Y. Free vascularized fibula  for  the treatment of  traumatic bone defects and nonunions of  the forearm bones. J Hand  Surg Br
2005;30B:67–72.